Skip to content.

Find topic

Web tools

Help

Tools

       Analysis Tool Bar  +
Main > ShakespeareAndTheQueensMen

Shakespeare and the Queen's Men

Re-organized by -- StaceyWheal - 18 Aug 2007

The Purpose of this Wiki

This is the working site for a project that is creating digital research and teaching resources for the Shakespeare and the Queen's Men project. These notes are our open working notes and are a work in progress.

The current SQM site is at http://tapor1-dev.mcmaster.ca/~thequeensmen/

Meeting Notes

November27(Peter, Holger, Zach, Stacey)

September 20
August 16 (Geoffrey Rockwell, Peter Cockett, Stacey Wheal)
June 12
June 12 Agenda and Notes
May 11

Website

Brainstorming
Theoretical Goals for the Site
Stacey's Examples, Designs and Prototypes
Site Content

DVD/Film Project

Editing of required portions to be done by Oct 12

Discussion & Ideas

  • (comment from HolgerSyme - 01 Jul 2007 05:23:26): I've made a few comments in the text.

A general organizational point: Breaking the site down into modules makes a lot of sense, but I think we should organize them somewhat hierarchically. To achieve the objective we discussed at the June 12 meeting, of making this both a research and a pedagogical tool, I think we should perhaps break the lot down into three groupings (this is off the cuff, but perhaps something like "Venues and Audiences," "Text into Performance," and "Gender" or, more broadly, "Casting" [in which case we could throw the doubling module in there]). The lead items in each of those categories would be "research" or documentary modules, such as "Clowning" or "Gender" or "Venues," which would then be accompanied by more interactive modules, such as "Performance Analysis" or "Doubling" or "Blocking-Setting" (although that obviously could just as easily go with "Text into Performance"...).

  • (comment from PeterCockett - 03 Jul 2007 18:40:15): I think this sounds like a good direction. We had set up a basic structure for each module which we were hoping to follow for all modules. It is listed above in the sentence under "Proposed Modules." I am starting to feel this might be a bit restrictive though. We should discuss this further.
  • (comment from HolgerSyme - 03 Jul 2007 19:49:39): I agree -- somehow missed that. I don't think every module should have to have a pedagogical angle, at least not an interactive one. (I.e., we ought to be able to mix and match the online equivalents of lectures and seminars...)


Use this box to quickly add a comment to the page.

more options...