Bibliography

Argamon, Shlomo and Olsen, Mark. “Viewpoint: Toward meaningful computing.” Communications of the ACM. Vol. 49, No. 4, 2006.

Brown, Susan, Patricia Clements, and Isobel Grundy, ed. Orlando: Women’s Writing in the British Isles from the Beginnings to the Present. Published online from Cambridge University Press Online, 2006. The Project home page is here

Crane, Gregory. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march06/crane/03crane.html^? D-Lib Magazine. Vol. 12, No. 3, March 2006.

Gantz, John F. (Project Director) The Expanding Digital Universe: A Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth Through 2010. IDC (subsidiary of International Data Group): Framingham, MA, 2007. www.emc.com/about/destination/digital_universe/

General Architecture for Text Engineering (GATE).

Facebook.

Flickr.

Frischer, Bernie and Jones, Anita (Summit Organizers). Summit on Digital Tools for the Humanities: Report on Summit Accomplishments. Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, University of Virginia. May 2006.

Hacking, Ian. Historical Ontology. Harvard UP: Cambridge, MA. 2002. ICT Method Network.

JSR 170: Content Repository for Java technology API.

Mann, Chris and Stewart, Fiona. Internet Communication and Qualitative Research. London and Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2000.

“Mashup (web application hybrid)”. Wikipedia.

Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. London and New York: Verso, 2005. Neuendorf, Kimberly A. The Content Analysis Guidebook. London and Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2002.

Newhagen, John E. and Rafaeli Sheizaf. "Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue". Originally in the Journal of Computed-Mediated Communication [Online] Vol. 1, No. 4. 1996.

Nutch.

Open Journal Systems. OJS is part of the Public Knowledge Project led by

openkapow.

O’Reilly, Tim. “What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” Sept. 2005.

Rockwell, Geoffrey. “Web Mining for Research”. White paper on the Text Analysis Developers Alliance wiki,

Rockwell, Geoffrey. “What is Text Analysis, Really”, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 18. no. 2, 2003, p. 209-219.

Text Analysis Portal for Research (TAPoR). Information about the project is at .

Text Encoding Initiative.

Annotation Sources :

Wikisource and wikibooks Wikis are not very suitable tools for annotation, but the wiki is what most people tend to think of when I talk about annotation. See for examples: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Annotations_of_The_Complete_Peanuts, http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/The_Grand_Inquisitor, http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Zimmerische_Chronik, http://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Von_abtuhung_der_Bylder

Weblogging and CommentPress^? Most weblog tools come with elementary comment facilities; CommentPress^? is an add-on for structured comments in WordPress^?. See e.g. annotation to Martin Luther King: http://www.futureofthebook.org/natestearns/letterfrombirminghamjail/

Virtual Humanities Lab Still at experimental stage http://golf.services.brown.edu/projects/VHL/index.php

Online Chopin Variorum Edition Also experimental http://www.ocve.org.uk/

Telma Limited facilities for private annotation and bookmarking http://www.cn-telma.fr/ For a sample edition see http://www.cn-telma.fr/nesle/

Gallica 2 beta Tagging at page level and bookmarks http://gallica2.bnf.fr/

UCLA Proper notes and bookmarks, that can be saved into collections and shared with others E.g. in http://digital.library.ucla.edu/canonlaw/

Collaboratories A number of sites offer facilities for collaboration of which annotation is only an ingredient (Collate, Ipsa, HyperNietzsche^?). A recent addition is Footnote (www.footnote.com), commercial and not geared towards scholarly use, but very remarkable in its range of annotation facilities.

Programming language manuals commenting facilities Popular open source platforms such as PHP and Perl have manuals where users can (and do) contribute notes. For a random sample: http://www.php.net/manual/en/security.general.php Again, not for scholarly use, but still an example of serious collaborative annotation that enhances the value of texts.

-- ShawnDay - 26 Jan 2008