|
Mandy sets up two repositories to help her track mentions of her company in the media, an ongoing task in her position. The first repository looks at general mentions online. First, she follows the steps of the Repository Wizard, where she names the repository ("General Maple Mentions"), sets up the style of item collection ("web spider") and sets the verbosity of site instructions ("very"). She sets the web spider to search for new instances of Waterloo Software or their product, "Maple 11" being mentioned online. So as to receive less irrelevant information, the Wizard suggests that Mandy populate a list of relevance keywords, such as "algebra","tool", and "programming", which then allows her to set a threshold of probable relevance. After asking what she is using the tool for, the Wizard suggests that Mandy organize her items using priority tags (e.g. "1" for most credible source, "3" for least important source). After completing her initial repository setup, Mandy returns to the Knowledge Manager to add addition ways of collecting items. She sets up a tool to monitor the changes of the "Waterloo Maple Software" Wikipedia pages as well as blog search mentions, categorizing accordingly the items obtained from these. If the web spider,wiki-tracker, or blog-watcher overlap, JiTR's instructions assure Mandy that the system won't put the same entry in twice. After a few days of testing JiTR, Mandy creates her second repository. This one is of major news and business news mentions. Shes sets it up similar to her first, except that the Wizard offers her a template that includes a web search with a "major media" filter list and a search tool for Lexis-Nexis. Since JiTR stores all the circumstances (metadata) of an item's amassment, the filtered web search of the second repository is able to scan the first repository, and gather any items that would have been pulled in had the second repository's search been running earlier. NOTES: As Geoffrey noted, why would she be using two repositories? A good (and I would add 'well understood') tagging/labelling system would make it unnecessary.
Scenario 2 Point-Form
| |